Apple claims iPad will replace netbooks.

I have been biting my tongue for some time now about the goings on with Apple and some of Steve Job’s outrageous accusations. Some of his most heinous accusations being that Adobe’s Flash cuts the iPad’s battery life from 10 hours to a mere 1.5 hours, and how HTML5 is going to succeed Flash for streaming video and other media.

HTML5 requires browsers support a codec like H.264 (currently patented by MPEG LA) which is proprietary and as such would cost a fortune in royalties to use, or a less efficient open-source codec like OGG. Neither of which currently have the ability to implement any form of DRM.
Anyhow getting back on track here, Apple’s most recent claim doesn’t come from Steve Job’s this time, but from his lackey and COO, Tim Cook. They are claiming that the Apple iPad, will wipe out the Netbook market with “magic”.
“The netbook is not an experience people are going to continue wanting to have,” Cook said, according to Macworld. “When they play with the iPad and experience the magic of using it … I have a hard time believing they’re going to go for a netbook.”
Lets go ahead and point out some things here:
| Netbooks: | iPads: |
|
|
Now I may be a bit biased here, but the point I am trying to get across is that Apple shouldn’t make these statements when their product really doesn’t cut the mustard when compared to the market they are pushing the product towards. They say that iPads will replace Netbooks. I don’t see that being the case because it doesn’t do what netbooks, at their core, are capable of doing, and thats multitasking. Netbooks are essentially stripped down laptops. And as such the iPad IS capable of many of what netbooks are used for, which is light browsing, emailing, and playing music and video. However being limited to one application at a time is the key nail in the coffin for this argument.
It’s not that multi-tasking isn’t a possibility, only that it’s currently not a viable option. Currently with Jailbroken iPhone’s/iTouch’s you can simulate multi-tasking with an app called Backgrounder. It is however extremely taxing on the battery. Did I mention you have to Jailbreak it? Which is kind of going against Apple’s EULA.
Most people would not be bothered by the lack of video outputs or USB ports because most of what they do with it would be online or via wireless network anyways. Which is why to some degree it could be a pseudo-netbook depending on your needs. However the other problem I have with the iPad, or more so with Apple itself is it’s the “We know what’s best for you” policy. In a nutshell you are really only renting the devices from them, because at this point they currently have the ability, and authority to restrict or even remove the apps you have on your hardware. The fact that they have repeatedly denied applications submitted by Google to the app store doesn’t help their case any. When they recently implemented their ban on “sexy” apps they removed all apps and will continue to deny apps which contain the following:
- No images of women in bikinis.
- No images of men in bikinis.
- No skin.
- No silhouettes.
- No sexual connotations or innuendo: boobs, babes, booty, sex.
- Nothing that can be sexually arousing.
- No apps will be approved that in any way imply sexual content.
Now personally I don’t blame them for deciding to remove those apps, but what about the people that have paid for them? Or the developers who wrote them; that seriously affects their income. If Apple can implement a Parental Control system in iTunes to keep things set at a specific rating level, then why can’t they explicitly apple those rules to iPods or iPhones? Would it really be so hard to plug in your child’s iPod and set it’s default rating to say PG-13, so that it restricts the content they upload like video or music or even the apps they can view in the app store?
I think they should let the end user control what content they deem acceptable to be placed/viewed on their devices, instead of Apple having the final say. It’s sad that Apple is treating its customers like they are 3 year old children who are utterly incapable of making decisions for themselves.
In closing I think Apple is just a little too full of themselves. I can argue up and down about how Apple has been dropping the ball and what they could do to get things back on track but I’d rather sit back and watch themselves continue to shoot themselves in the foot.



Lately there have been a number of complaints coming from the tech sector, with AT&T’s Ralph de la Vega complaining about 